Darling Ingredients reports mixed Q3 results amid market headwinds By Investing.com

Darling Ingredients Inc. (NYSE: NYSE:) faced a challenging market environment in Q3 2024, as sluggish global demand for ingredients and a difficult renewable diesel market impacted its financial performance. CEO Randall C. Stuewe reported a decrease in net income to $16.9 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, from $125 million, or $0.77 per diluted share, in the same quarter of the previous year. Despite these headwinds, the company managed to reduce its debt by approximately $192 million, ending the quarter with $4.246 billion in total debt. Net sales also declined to $1.4 billion from $1.6 billion year-over-year. However, the company remains optimistic for 2025, expecting improved margins and demand, with a projected combined EBITDA of $1.15 billion to $1.175 billion for FY 2024.

Key Takeaways

• Darling Ingredients reported a combined adjusted EBITDA of $236.7 million in Q3 2024.
• Net income dropped to $16.9 million ($0.11 per diluted share) from $125 million ($0.77 per diluted share) year-over-year.
• Total net sales decreased to $1.4 billion from $1.6 billion.
• Debt reduced by approximately $192 million, with a total debt of $4.246 billion.
• Optimism for 2025 with anticipated improved margins and demand.
• Projected combined EBITDA for FY 2024 is between $1.15 billion and $1.175 billion.
• A $0.01 change in waste fat price could result in approximately $12 million in annual EBITDA.
• The company is in the commissioning phase for its SAF plant and expects clarity on the 45Z tax credit soon.

Company Outlook

• Darling Ingredients projects a strong financial year in 2025 with improved margins and demand.
• The company aims to reduce debt to below 3 times by the end of 2026, with a long-term target of 2.5 times.
• Capital expenditure for 2025 is projected to be between $450 million and $500 million.

Bearish Highlights

• Challenging market environment and sluggish global ingredient demand affected Q3 performance.
• Difficult renewable diesel market and lower volumes in the Food segment, particularly in China.

Bullish Highlights

• Strong raw material volumes in the Feed Ingredients segment, especially in Brazil.
• The company is optimistic about the regulatory environment for renewable fuels.
• Rising waste fat prices could significantly enhance EBITDA.

Misses

• The company missed its previous net income and net sales figures from Q3 2023.

Q&A Highlights

• Executives expect clarity on the 45Z tax credit to positively impact cash generation and debt calculations.
• The SAF plant is in the commissioning phase, with optimism for future contracts.
• Management anticipates non-price driven margin improvements in 2025 due to enhanced procurement strategies.
• The impact of biofuel imports on fat pricing is expected to decrease in 2025, positively affecting market conditions.

Darling Ingredients Inc. is navigating a difficult period, with market challenges reflected in their latest quarterly results. However, the company’s strategic focus on debt reduction, optimism about regulatory changes, and the potential for improved margins and demand in the renewable fuels sector indicate a positive outlook for 2025. The company’s ability to manage its Feed and Food segments amid global shifts and domestic market conditions will be crucial as it aims to return to historical performance levels and capitalize on the growing demand for renewable fuels.

InvestingPro Insights

Darling Ingredients’ recent financial performance aligns with several key insights from InvestingPro. Despite the challenging Q3 2024 results, the company’s long-term potential remains noteworthy. InvestingPro data shows that Darling Ingredients has a market capitalization of $6.01 billion, reflecting its significant presence in the ingredients and renewable products industry.

An InvestingPro Tip highlights that Darling Ingredients has been profitable over the last twelve months, which is consistent with the company’s ability to navigate through difficult market conditions. This profitability is further supported by the company’s P/E ratio of 16.23, suggesting that investors are still willing to pay a premium for the company’s earnings despite recent challenges.

Another relevant InvestingPro Tip indicates that Darling Ingredients has liquid assets exceeding short-term obligations. This financial stability is particularly important given the company’s focus on debt reduction, as mentioned in the article. The strong liquidity position may provide Darling Ingredients with the flexibility needed to weather current market headwinds and invest in future growth opportunities, such as the SAF plant mentioned in the report.

It’s worth noting that while the article discusses a decrease in net sales, InvestingPro data shows a revenue of $6.11 billion over the last twelve months. This figure, along with the company’s gross profit margin of 23.77%, provides context for Darling Ingredients’ financial scale and operational efficiency.

For investors seeking a more comprehensive analysis, InvestingPro offers additional tips and metrics that could provide deeper insights into Darling Ingredients’ financial health and future prospects. In fact, there are 5 more InvestingPro Tips available for Darling Ingredients, which could be valuable for those looking to make informed investment decisions.

Full transcript – Darling Ingredients Inc (DAR) Q3 2024:

Operator: Good morning, and welcome to the Darling Ingredients Inc. Conference Call to discuss the Company’s Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results. After the speakers’ prepared remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session period, and instructions to ask a question will be given at that time. Today’s call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Miss. Suann Guthrie. Please go ahead.

Suann Guthrie: Hi. Thank you for joining the Darling Ingredients third quarter 2024 earnings call. Here with me today are Mr. Randall C. Stuewe, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Brad Phillips, Chief Financial Officer; Mr. Bob Day, Chief Strategy Officer; and Mr. Matt Jansen, Chief Operating Officer of North America. Our third quarter 2024 earnings news release and slide presentation are available on the Investor page under the Events and Presentations tab on our corporate website and will be joined by a transcript of this call once it is available. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in today’s press release and the comments made during this conference call and in the risk factors section of our Form 10-K, 10-Q and other reported filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Now, I will hand the call over to Randy.

Randall Stuewe: Thanks, Suann. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. During the third quarter, Darling Ingredients continue to navigate challenging markets with global ingredient demand and pricing remaining sluggish and a difficult renewable diesel market. Despite these headwinds, our core ingredients performance was flat sequentially but generated adequate cash and dividends from Diamond Green Diesel, allowing us to reduce debt by about $192 million. Operationally, our global asset base performed well and we continued our focus on widening margins, managing CapEx and reducing SG&A. For the quarter, our combined adjusted EBITDA was $236.7 million, primarily a reflection of sequentially steady finished product pricing and a challenging renewable diesel market. Turning to the Feed Ingredients segment. Raw material volumes remained strong, primarily driven by growth in Brazil. Fat prices are slowly recovering, but the rebound is much slower than anticipated, clearly reflecting the challenges other RD producers are experiencing ramping their pretreatment units to run on low carbon waste feed, fat feedstocks and the impact of some imported feedstocks. As many of you know, summertime is typically very challenging on our operations, and we naturally see a slight degradation in gross margins. I’m pleased to report that the third quarter 2024, we saw a slight increase in feed gross margin percentage sequentially. This is attributed to the hard work and dedication of our operations team working on spread management and ultimately, cost control programs. Now turning to the Food segment. We saw lower volumes, which were attributed to softer demand in China, new capacity additions in Brazil and continued customer destocking. However, we continue to hold strong margins despite the declining sales price in the global market. On a positive note, next week, we will be a supply-side West North America trade show in Las Vegas. We will be showcasing Nextida.GC, a natural collagen solution targeting glucose moderation and a clinical trial conducted by Darling Ingredients. Nextida.GC significant lower post-meal glucose spikes in the blood by an average of 42%. For Darling, we have unlocked the next wave of collagen-based solutions that are potentially revolutionary. Now turning to our Fuel segment. DGD margins remain challenged given the delay and lack of clarity in the regulatory markets for RINs and LCFS. Despite the softer margins at DGD, we received $111.2 million cash dividend distribution from the joint venture in the third quarter. Our sustainable aviation fuel unit is mechanically complete and in the process of commissioning. We continue to build a strong sales book, and I have now announced our third contract earlier this month. For 2025, we remain very optimistic about the regulatory landscape. We believe we will have clarity on the California low carbon fuel standard program and the federal tax credit known as 45Z very soon paving the way for greater growth and improved margins at DGD along with stronger demand for our low carbon feedstocks. With that, now I’d like to hand the call over to Brad to take us through some financials and then I’ll come back and discuss my thoughts on the rest of 2024 and the outlook for 2025.

Brad Phillips: Okay, Randy. Net income for the third quarter 2024 totaled $16.9 million or $0.11 per diluted share compared to net income of $125 million or $0.77 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2023. Total net sales were $1.4 billion for the third quarter 2024 as compared to $1.6 billion for the third quarter 2023. Operating income decreased $118.3 million to $60.1 million for the third quarter of 2024 compared to $178.4 million for the third quarter of 2023, primarily due to a $72.9 million decline in gross margin and a $52 million decline in our share in the equity and net income from Diamond Green Diesel earnings as compared to the same period in 2023, which were partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter 2024 as compared to the same period in 2023. Other expenses decreased $4.9 million in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the same period in 2023, primarily due to a decline in interest expense as well as an increase from property casualty gains. For the first nine months of 2024, net income was $177 million or $1.10 per diluted share as compared to net income of $563.2 million or $3.47 per diluted share for the first nine months of 2023. Net sales for the first nine months were $4.3 billion compared to net sales of $5.2 billion for the same period in 2023. Operating income decreased $445.1 million to $345.8 million for the first nine months of 2024 compared to $790.9 million for the first nine months of 2023. The decrease was primarily the result of a $264.5 million decline in gross margin and a $236.6 million decline in our share in the equity and net income from Diamond Green Diesel earnings as compared to the same period in 2023. Other expenses increased $16.7 million for the first nine months of 2024 as compared to the same period in 2023 primarily due to an increase in interest expense and a decline in foreign currency gains. As far as taxes for the first three months ended September 28, 2024, the company reported an income tax benefit of $17.5 million and a significant negative tax rate, primarily due to the biofuel tax incentives. Given the almost breakeven pretax earnings, the effective tax rate as a percentage of pretax earnings is not meaningful for the three months ended September 2024. The company paid $26.6 million of income taxes in the third quarter. For the nine months ended September 28, 2024, the company reported an income tax benefit of $12.8 million and an effective tax rate of negative 7.6%. The company’s effective tax rate, excluding the biofuel tax incentives and discrete items, is 28.1% for the nine months ended September 28, 2024. The company also has paid $82.4 million of income taxes year-to-date as of the end of the third quarter. For 2024, we are projecting an effective tax rate of negative 5% and cash taxes of approximately $15 million for the remainder of the year. In the third quarter, we paid down approximately $192 million in debt. The company’s total debt outstanding as of September 28, 2024, was $4.246 billion compared to $4.427 billion at year-end 2023. Our bank covenant projected leverage ratio at Q3 2024 was 4.04 times and we had approximately $1 billion available to borrow under our revolving credit facility. Capital expenditures totaled $67.4 million in the third quarter and $259.1 million for the first nine months. As Randy mentioned earlier, we received $111.2 million in cash dividends from Diamond Green Diesel during the quarter. With that, back to you, Randy.

Randall Stuewe: Hey, thanks, Brad. We are increasingly optimistic about 2025 and believe tailwinds will commence very soon. Our Specialty Ingredients business is well positioned and we’ve made the necessary improvements to deliver increased margins. In addition, we expect margins to improve at DGD and fat prices to improve globally. The transition to the PTC (NASDAQ:) will definitely favor Darling, and we will once again demonstrate our ability to be the largest, most reliable, most cost-efficient renewable diesel and sustainable aviation producer in the world. With three quarters of the year behind us, our core business is performing nicely, but waste fat prices are still lagging and R&D margins are modestly improving, but waiting on regulatory clarity. This would suggest 2024 fiscal year combined adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $1.15 billion up to $1.175 billion, not where we wanted to be, but still our fourth best performance in our 142-year history. As we look forward to 2025, Darling Ingredients has tremendous tailwinds building that had the potential to propel us back into record earnings levels for both our specialty ingredients and renewable businesses. Our global collagen business is positioned nicely for returned growth as we launch new innovations and market conditions become more favorable. From a decarbonization standpoint, state and now federally renewable fuel incentives greatly favor the use of waste fats and oil of which Darling is the largest producer in the world. In fact, renewable diesel and SAF producers that want to be profitable, will need to switch to waste fats and oils, which will ultimately benefit our specialty ingredients business. Diamond Green Diesel is positioned nicely to continue to benefit from both federal and state program improvements as it is the premier producer of renewable diesel and SAF capable of utilizing the most economical waste fats and oils sourced globally. We have 11-plus years of successful production under our belt and now we can say we are the largest and most successful producer in the world. So now let’s take a quick look and an early look at 2025. Even kind of from a worst-case perspective, assuming fat prices are somewhat steady or unchanged, and Diamond Green Diesel produces approximately 250 million gallons of SAF and 1 billion gallons of renewable diesel, and let’s assume RINs and LCFS value stay relatively unchanged or flat, I see the combined earning power of our platform to be in excess of $1.5 billion for next year. However, given what we see in the market, we believe LCFS and RINs will increase and waste fat prices will also move higher. As we have said, $0.01 move in the waste fat price means about $12 million EBITDA annually for Darling during the year. It’s impossible for me to precisely predict how the waste fats and oil is complex and RINs and LCFS markets will shape up over the next year. But clearly, the transition from the blender’s tax credit to the Clean Fuels producer credit or 45Z will be positive for Darling in many ways from favoring waste fats to providing additional cash for delevering. I’m very bullish on Darling. We have a number of tailwinds pushing us into 2025, and I believe this could all result in the highest EBITDA for our company in its history. With that, let’s go to Q&A.

Operator: [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Tom Palmer of Citi. Go ahead, please.

Thomas Palmer: Good morning and thanks for the question. Thanks for the color on 2025, just starting out, but maybe we could touch first on kind of the implied outlook as we think about the fourth quarter, it does imply a pretty meaningful improvement versus what we saw in the third quarter. So maybe could we touch on some of the items that you see driving that inflection as we look at the fourth quarter, because it would seem like we’re getting close to that $1.5 billion annual run rate in the fourth quarter just based on the implied guidance. Thank you.

Randall Stuewe: Yes, Tom, this is Randy. Essentially, there’s several assumptions that go into the fourth quarter. As we said in the script, traditionally, we have operational challenges in Q3. That’s around the world with wastewater and quality. So you always see some natural pickup there. We didn’t see any fat price improvement really modestly in Q3. We are selling products now and finished fats both in South America and in North America at a higher level than we did in Q3. The collagen business had a pretty bumpy Q3. Some of it was timing of shipments out of Brazil, but ultimately, we see a little improvement there. We’re still seeing a bit of recession around the world, and it ranges from China to Europe to the U.S. in fuel or food ingredient demand. And then ultimately, we’ve got a pretty good number in there to get there for Diamond Green Diesel for — in Q4 here. It doesn’t have any assumption for anybody that wants to know of any SAF shipments in there at this time. So hopefully, that will — if we are successful there, which I believe we will, that could once again support that number and the run rate into 2025.

Thomas Palmer: Thanks for the color there. I wanted to follow up quickly just on the Food segment. It sounded like some of the issues that we saw in terms of 3Q were more transitory and then some maybe as the competitive environment has changed a little bit. So maybe as we think through the coming year, you do have the new products rolling out. And I guess to what extent does that offset the competitive environment? Do you think we’ve kind of seen the full magnitude of some of the capacity coming online? And so from here at least stable to better would be the expectation?

Robert Day: Yes. Thanks, Tom. This is Bob. I think you’re right. I mean we’re seeing today just a bit more capacity that’s come on to the market, gelatin margins kind of a little more pressure than they had been. But like you said, we see that stabilizing as we go into 2025. And our expectation is that the next data GC product will get traction. And that product is sold at much higher margins. So I think that’s correct that we expect to see stable results in that business in 2025 and a strong trend as we end the year.

Randall Stuewe: Yes, and I’ll build on that a little bit from — if you look at Darling, one of the competitive advantages and disadvantages we have is we’re public. And we do segment and share and ultimately, the main raw material in our specialty collagen business is bovine hide Grass Fed bovine hide. The transparency of the earnings power that we have ultimately, no different than Diamond Green Diesel in the sense of how successful we’ve been there, attracted competition. It’s somewhat of a micro market around the world, the numbers range from 600,000 to 700,000 tons globally. And ultimately, when you added the 15,000 or 20,000 ton plant, it takes a year or so to place that volume. And that’s what’s happened in Brazil with a couple of factories. They’re looking for customers today. Ultimately, how do you get a customer, you buy a customer. And so that’s the driver of the decline in sales value. But ultimately, it also — it’s a spread management business for us on the commodity gelatin business and then ultimately in the collagen business. It is a very specialty ingredient. So our margins have pretty much maintained what we’ve been able to hold. The outlook for 2025 is exciting for us. I mean, obviously, next week, we talked about being out to launch Nextida, it is available. There are a number of customers there and how quickly that ramps up. And then we’ve got three or four other products behind it now that will be coming on over the course of the next year, two years, three years. So we see ourselves differentiating ourselves once again from everybody else in that business, but ultimately, it’s a great business, and we’re — and also keep in mind when you look at that business, remember, 80% of that business is really kind of feed and fat. And so ultimately, if we get any fat price improvement, that ultimately translates back into that business to on top of the specialty ingredient being generated. So that looks pretty strong for 2025 here.

Thomas Palmer: Okay, thank you.

Operator: Our next question comes from Paul Cheng of Scotiabank. Go ahead, please.

Paul Cheng: Hey, good morning guys.

Randall Stuewe: Good morning.

Paul Cheng: Maybe this is for Brad. Brad, any idea that how the 2025 CapEx outlook? And also that you guys have been great success on the cost reduction. Could you give us some idea that how much left in the fourth quarter and also into 2025? That’s the first question.

Brad Phillips: Okay. If I heard right, the first question was about 2025 capital expenditure outlook.

Paul Cheng: And also a reduction.

Brad Phillips: Okay. The CapEx outlook would be probably more closer to back what we projected this year, probably the $450 million to $500 million range, I would say. I think for the current year, we’re still on track to be in the ballpark of that $400 million or maybe lower?

Randall Stuewe: Yes. Paul, this is Randy. Through Q3, we spent $259 million. That’s probably one of our lowest rent rates ever. You kind of look at the working capital improvement around $340 million. And you can see how we’re managing the business through improved inventories. Cost reductions are something that we don’t break out. It’s just part of our culture and how we run our business around the world. So we’ve been successful in closing some offices in North America, taking out some simplifying our organization in many areas. I always tend to be very quiet about that stuff because it impacts people’s lives. But ultimately, I’d say for next year, kind of use that $450 million number as we go forward here. And that will be really the maintenance, the environmental and the fleet side here with no growth in there.

Paul Cheng: And Randy — on the food ingredient business, you mentioned that still you are seeing some supply increase and you’re seeing customer around the world destocking. Do you think that that’s coming to an end? In other words, that other than the one that is supposed to be coming on stream, do you expect additional mall facility or new supply going to come on stream? And whether that when you talk to your customers, what is the destocking because you’ve been going on for literally for a year on the destocking. I mean how much lower that you can get?

Robert Day: Yes. Thanks, Paul. This is Bob. I think that this is we’re going to continue to see it over the next quarter or so. I mean, broadly, the market has been aggressively pursuing the destocking of inventories. But we’re — these things typically take longer than expected. The good thing for Rousselot is we’ve had long-term contracts in place that have allowed us to earn higher margins despite this restocking environment than our competition. And we believe that by the time the destocking is over and when we do have to renegotiate contracts in the future that will be done with that cycle. So overall, we’re not too concerned about that.

Paul Cheng: How about on the supply increase?

Robert Day: Sorry, say that again?

Paul Cheng: How about the supply increase, the new capacity increase?

Robert Day: Yes. So new capacity coming on. As Randy said, a 15,000 ton increase in capacity can have a short-term impact on margins. The nice thing about that business is the collagen market continues to grow at a pretty fast pace. So over a relatively short period of time, we can absorb an additional supply increase into the market like that, and that’s what we’re expecting to see here over the next several months.

Paul Cheng: Thank you.

Operator: The next question comes from Dushyant Ailani of Jefferies. Go ahead, please.

Dushyant Ailani: Hi, guys, can you hear me?

Robert Day: Sure.

Dushyant Ailani: Awesome. Yes, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. One on SAF, just real quick. Could you share some color on your sales book? I know that you guys have announced some orders maybe you could you share how much has been contracted thus far besides what you have announced? And maybe do you have a target split between contracted and spot, if any?

Matthew Jansen: Dushyant, this is Matt. Good morning. I think I understood your question. And so as Randy mentioned, our SAF plant is mechanically complete. And we’re in the commissioning phase right now. We’re very excited about where we are in that. I would say that, that project has been now actually early and under budget. So — and we’ve made a few announcements over the last few weeks with some of the contracts that we have made. I would just say that not all of the contracts get announced there for competitive reasons as an example. And so we have lots of different discussions going on. We have already completed some contracts, as you know. And I’m quite optimistic about our future there and our ability to contract product and make deliveries. A lot of these contracts are one to three years in tenure. And so it’s really not necessarily our intention to go spot right now on material volume, but we’ll see how — as time develops. But again, we’re confident in our ability to make the sales on product.

Dushyant Ailani: Awesome. Thank you, Matt. And then just a follow-up on just your like debt targets going forward with a constructive kind of feedback that you guys have or all the constructive picture that you guys have painted for 2025 how do you think about your debt targets, especially as you have some maturities coming in, in 2026. Maybe it’s too early to talk about it, but if you have any thoughts there?

Brad Phillips: Dushyant, this is Brad. So where we are now, just a touch above for, anticipate year-end here being right around in that ballpark. Obviously, always to a bit degrees on — depends on dividends at DGD next year, we are definitely projecting to be the back half of the year be below 3 times. So it really get beyond that in 2026. The momentum will definitely be down. So 2026, I’ll just generally say, all things being equal, we’d be much lower than 3.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. And ultimately, the target is unchanged at 2.5 times. I think the thing that people have to understand and while we’re still waiting for a little bit of IRS clarity here, which we believe is coming, the 45Z allows us to market that credit and generate cash rather than waiting for the waterfall or the distribution out of DGD. That in itself creates a very fundamental change in how much cash comes into the mother ship here and that how the debt ratio from now on gets calculated. So it’s a very positive outlook for 2025 here. And it puts us in a position then to once again by the back half of the year, as Brad says, to really start evaluating what the long-term both capital structure and the return to shareholders opportunities will provide to us.

Dushyant Ailani: Thank you.

Operator: Our next question comes from Heather Jones of Heather Jones Research. Go ahead, please.

Heather Jones: Good morning, thanks for the question. Brandy, you mentioned that you expect to have visibility on 45Z soon. And some of the conferences I’ve gone through lately and just people have talked to, there seems to be a very low expectation of having any visibility on that this year. So I was just wondering if you could share with us what is underpinning your confidence that we’ll get that soon.

Matthew Jansen: Hi, Heather, this is Matt. Look, I would — we hear a lot of the same, let’s say, input that you’re talking about. And we’ve got a lot of discussions going on our side. We remain optimistic that we’re going to get clarity on 45Z with the guidance where it is provisional guidance or — and then it will certainly spill over into 2025 but we do believe that this is something that is imminent. And we’re anxiously waiting for it, obviously. But I would say that we hear some of the same chat that you’re talking about and don’t disregard that. But it’s something that over the next coming weeks, we hope to have more insight.

Heather Jones: And when you say spillover into 2025, like are you expecting the visibility to come in stages?

Matthew Jansen: Potentially.

Randall Stuewe: Potentially, but we don’t look at it, Heather, is it going to happen or not happen. I mean, we don’t look at it as a line in the sand, all the discussions we’re having with the proper people are that it’s imminent. A little bit of timing here, but it doesn’t mean that it won’t be retro and be part of it. I mean when we look at our cash generation for next year, really at the end of the day, we look at that we’ll be able to market three quarters of that credit next year. So that’s — we’re taking a conservative approach to it, but we’re not taking an approach that it can’t gets kicked down the field to mid-25. I just don’t see that happening. Bob, do you have any different opinion here?

Robert Day: No, I agree with that.

Heather Jones: Okay. And then my second question was on Diamond Green. So looking at margins and I live the feedstock, etcetera. There has been a significant improvement in margins. But going from your Q3 to what seems to be implied in your Q4, I’m not seeing that kind of step up. So I was just wondering, it was Q3 affected by any high-priced feedstocks that you had locked in or something like that? Just given that you’re not embedding fast in those numbers, just wondering if you could help us understand why we’re going to get such a big step-up in Diamond Green.

Robert Day: Yes. I guess — yes, so what we’ve seen — what we saw through quarter three is a lot of movement with all of the inputs as there’s we’ve had a relative amount of uncertainty in this market. As we go into the fourth quarter, we’re really going to be shaping up for 2025. And as we sit here today, 2025, the outlook is really positive for renewable diesel companies that can utilize low CI score feedstock. And so what we are expecting as we move through the quarter is that we’re going to see margin improvement as we go through the quarter, companies are positioning for 2025, there’s a couple of realities that are important here. If you look at ending 2024 supply, we’re shaping up to have produced 3.2 billion gallons of renewable diesel, 2 billion gallons of biodiesel and about 1 billion gallons of imports. So that’s like 6.2 billion gallons of supply. And when you look at 2025, we need just to satisfy the mandates and normal export demand, we’re going to need a 5.7 billion gallons of supply and renewable diesel depending on what happens with carb [ph] renewable diesel is going to be, could be $0.50 to a $1 a gallon more competitive. So we need biodiesel to be operating at a positive margin in order to satisfy mandates. And so as we get to the end of 2024, that should really provide a lot of support. We’re obviously expecting positive outcomes from LCFS prior to the end of the year.

Operator: Okay. The next question comes from John — I’m sorry, from Manav Gupta of UBS. Go ahead, please.

Manav Gupta: Good morning, guys. So as we are looking at the RIN prices, they are rebounding. LCS is also rebounding, which could be because of the November 8 meeting. But the way the RIN prices are rebounding, it seems that some low-quality biodiesel or renewable diesel production has already started to shut down. So I just wanted to understand if you are seeing that. And do you think this trend accelerates, once we go from BTC to PTC that some of the lower-quality non-profitable BDRD production might continue to shut down in 2025.

Randall Stuewe: So we’ll kind of tag team this question, Manav. I mean number one, clearly, you’re seeing the world reevaluate future investments and whether the — and operating of renewable diesel plants or construction of new plants. I mean you saw it in BP (NYSE:), Shell (LON:), any now around the world. Clearly, Neste [ph] is having their challenges, that’s been well reported here. When you start to think of what’s starting to hit the market here is not only some shuttering of capacity but Neste’s offline now. And then with the transition from the BTC to the PTC, clearly trying to make a cutoff time to be blended and sold is now the clock is ticking. And that’s what Bob was trying to allude to, to Heather’s question there is we’re in the midst of watching this change right now. We’re seeing California physical gallon demand is very, very tight right now. And so ultimately, you can see what’s happening is as these imports are starting to slow down coming in. You’re seeing that in the RINs. The LCFS with the limited number of obligated parties there and liquidity there, they’re waiting for some clarity there. But I think you’re within a week or so of having that. And then I just see this thing really starting to improve next year. Bob alluded to 1 billion gallons of imports. It was 527 million gallons through June clearly, it will slow down a little bit here the back half. Then you got to add on the increase in the RVO next year — and then yes, Geismar [ph] probably will be online, although they’re offline right now also. And so you get a couple of things that are tailwinds to Darling. One is if you’re going to be profitable in this business, you’ve got to learn to run waste fats. And so far, the industry has it. Imports have slowed of imported feedstocks into the country. That’s a result of European changes now and then also China taking back their feedstocks and processing themselves. So there’s a lot of movement in the world. We were bringing up a lot of feedstock out of our operations in Brazil. The domestic market for biofuels in Brazil now is a premium to the U.S. So there’s lots of different pieces that are happening here around the world that are setting the stage for 2025. Bob, do you want to add something to make me look smarter here?

Robert Day: Yes. Look, I mean, I think if you just kind of take a snapshot of today, spot margins for biodiesel are somewhere in the neighborhood of $0.10 a gallon. And so if you take a blenders tax credit out of that, that’s negative $0.90. As I said earlier, biodiesel needs to be produced in order to satisfy the mandate in 2025. So we need to migrate towards a positive biodiesel margin. And as current indications around PTC or that biodiesel made from soy, it wouldn’t be eligible for the PTC. So we need to see a pretty significant improvement in margins. Otherwise, we won’t have enough supply. And so to answer your question, Manav, yes, as we get towards the end of the year, I think we expect to see idling of plants and until or unless margins improve.

Randall Stuewe: I would say just to pile on, Manav, one thing to keep in mind is as we go into our SAF production, SAF production, that’s one-for-one gallons of RD that will not be available on the market.

Manav Gupta: Perfect. My quick follow-up here is, historically, the Feed segment margins could go in that 23% to 25% range. You’re trending around that 21%. So any margin enhancement opportunities in 2025 as they relate to the Feed segment.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. I mean, clearly, we’re still improving our operations on the Eastern Shore Clearly, we’re improving our procurement strategies in South America. And we’re also focused on improving our procurement strategies on raw material in North America. That should start to translate through into, what I’d say, non-price driven margin improvements for 2025. And then if you get any uplift in fat prices, that would ultimately put back into that 23% to 25% range. Anything you want to add on…

Brad Phillips: It’s Brad, Manav. It’s spread management, it’s at prices and it’s also reliability and operations of the plant.

Operator: Our next question is from John Royall of JPMorgan. Go ahead, please.

John Royall: Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So I was hoping you could update us on your expectations around the per gallon profitability uplift from running staff versus RD at DGD. And then what’s baked into your $1.5 billion soft guide for 2025 in terms of the contraction from SAF?

Brad Phillips: Yes. I would say from a pricing and margin standpoint within our SAF. There’s — but that’s not something that we’re openly discussing, I would just say that the margins do meet or exceed our project economics that we had put into the project, and I don’t look for that to change.

John Royall: Okay. And then I was hoping you could dig in a little bit on the imports you discussed that are dragging a bit on fat pricing relative to your expectations. Just any more color there? And do you expect that to continue? Or is that more of a transitory impact.

Brad Phillips: Imports of fat or fuel or both?

John Royall: I believe the comment was on fats in your opener, but correct me if I’m wrong.

Brad Phillips: Okay. So on — so imports of biofuel have actually had a bigger impact on fat prices in North America than imports of waste oils and fats just due to the fat volume equivalent. Imports of biofuel, we expect to significantly decrease in 2025 because those imports won’t be eligible for a producer tax credit, and so they’re going to be less competitive. So that should have a positive impact. As far as imports of used cooking oil and animal fats, it’s really going to be supply and demand and price related, but there’s really nothing that we believe will prevent those products from continuing to come to the market.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. And ultimately, as you look now, Palm oil is now at a high ever since 2022, lower production, strong demand in the world, changing biomandates within those APAC countries. Same thing we’re seeing in Brazil right now as they move their mandate up. It’s been a long time for several of us in this room to know when U.S. soybean oil has been competitive in the world market for export, but we are today. So that’s what we’re seeing. The world is moving right now. 30% of the globe’s renewable fuels demand is supplied by veg oils globally. The advantage waste fats have, which will only be accelerated and exacerbated by the PTC is significant. So the full point being is if you have the capability you will run waste fats. And so far, we’re seeing some — we’re seeing one of the West Coast guys try to operate on waste fats while the other one is not. So there’s some changes happening right in front of us here.

Operator: The next question comes from Andrew Strelzik of BMO. Go ahead, please.

Andrew Strelzik: Hey good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Just first one, I just wanted to clarify your comments or take another stab at that around the framework for 2025. And does that $1.5 billion that you articulated include a SAF uplift? I guess it doesn’t really sound like it since it’s the run rate that’s implied for the fourth quarter? And is there an assumption on tax credits and how that’s going to shake out?

Randall Stuewe: Yes. Andrew, the crystal ball has a little bit of fog in it in this early in the season right now. That’s the reason we kind of threw the $1.5 billion out there. Clearly, we think we’re going to move out of November and December with some pretty good momentum here. And so that — how that translates through, whether it’s feedstock pricing or whether it’s margin and SAF improvement, in 2025, it’s yet to see. We’re just telling you that we see a much improved environment next year for cash generation and deleveraging and other opportunities that exist.

Andrew Strelzik: Got it. Okay. That’s very clear. And then my other question, you’ve talked about RD margins having improved a little bit. Certainly, you’ve got the SAF tailwind for next year. But one of the things that we struggle with is kind of the capture rate relative to paper margins, which, by our math, keep kind of moderating. And so I guess maybe my math is wrong, but I guess what I’m asking is, is there something in the recent or current market environment that is limiting the ability to capture those paper margins or maybe on the flip side as we go into kind of a more favorable environment, is there the ability to increase that capture rate on kind of the base DGD margins going forward? Thanks.

Randall Stuewe: Mean it’s an academic question and I understand it. And we track a paper margin every day. And when I look back, non-LCM it averaged for Q3 around $0.45 a gallon approximately. And without the LCM, we got about 80% of that. And so if you look at the daily margin up and down, there are some pretty big valleys in there. And ultimately, the way those contracts work is when it’s the bill of lading date of the vessel to ship, the barge, the railcar, whatever you want to call it, the pipeline shipment and some of them look back 3 days, some of them look back 7 days. And so it’s always a timing issue. So trying to get it to match ratably is impossible. So I don’t know, Bob, Matt, you guys…

Robert Day: I would just say that it’s fair to say that considering the plants and their size and scale, we have a constant book on the purchase side as well as the sales side. And those — and on an average, I would say, 1 to 2 months long. And so as the margins don’t necessarily change by the tick in terms of what we actually achieve.

Operator: Okay, our next question comes from Matthew Blair of Tudor, Pickering, Holt. Go ahead, please.

Matthew Blair: Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Could you talk a little bit about the market for RD exports? European RD margins are moving up in October here, and the British Columbia LCFS pricing has really rebounded after some pretty weak numbers in July. Would you expect that RD exports to be a source of improvement in the fourth quarter versus the third quarter?

Matthew Jansen: Hey good morning. Matt, Matt here. So our approach is basically best economics. It determines where we make our sales. And so you’re right, we have seen an improvement in some of the export markets. And that’s one of the beautiful things about DGD and its strategic locations on the Gulf Coast. So we can not only import very cost effectively, but also export very cost effectively. So we’re constantly in those markets. And if we have a better opportunity to export, and that’s what we’re going to do.

Matthew Blair: Sounds good. And then I know your feedstock slate on the RD side is typically 1/3 fats, 1/3 corn oil, 1/3 used cooking oil, was there any feedstock switching in the third quarter? There were certain points during the quarter where it looked like R&D from soybean oil actually was pretty attractive due to cheap soybean oil prices. So was there any unusual or atypical feedstock movements for DGD in the third quarter?

Matthew Jansen: Not out of the ordinary. And those — that combination of 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, it’s not exactly — yes. That’s not exactly the true breakout. There’s other products. But I would say that — but there was nothing out of the ordinary in the product mix.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. We are way heavier animal and eco based than anything else at the locations. Now it’s customer-driven, it’s CI driven and different CIs and then feedstocks are available for different geographies in the world that we ship to. So always a mass balance of what we’re producing there, both on availability, most importantly on quality, and that’s what drives it.

Operator: Okay, our next question comes from Ryan Todd of Simmons Energy. Go ahead, please.

Ryan Todd: Thanks. Maybe a follow-up on the on the base business side in particular, the feed business. In the third quarter, with the base business right now running at a run rate of around $850 million in annual EBITDA. I know you’ve typically talked about that as kind of $1 billion a year business. And the 4Q and 2025 guide certainly seem to suggest that kind of improvement. So maybe how much improvement do you — are you assuming to get to — I mean, are baked in that 4Q number? And to get back to the $1 billion level, I mean, based on your sensitivities, there’s probably another $0.12 to $0.13 improvement in fat pricing. So what have you seen quarter-to-date that gives you confidence on kind of getting to those levels because it seems a little more than what we can see on the screen right now.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. Volumes remain strong around the world, operational improvements that are happening in North America and South America for us really, feedstock pricing improvements are happening. I’m seeing — as we said, palm oil is $1,000 a ton or nearly $0.50 a pound here. We’re moving towards those prices now at many of our factories around the world. And that’s a major improvement versus averaging $0.38 to $0.40 in the first half of the year. So that’s — the main driver is the slow but improving, as I call it, lagging feedstock prices out there as we move forward, Ryan. And then some improvement in the food business, and we’ll just see how it flows through here at the end. Keep in mind that in Q1 that there was a $25 million prior year adjustment. So that’s really in our thinking, too. The Q1 reported at $280 million was really operationally at $305 million. So as we go forward, getting back to those mid-3 level numbers for us doesn’t seem out of reach.

Ryan Todd: Thanks. And then maybe a follow-up on the SAF side. What — any thoughts at a high level in terms of how you expect the European market to figure into things? Is that — do you look at the European market as a potentially higher margin destination for your product as you think about kind of export versus domestic demand looking into 2025 and thoughts on maybe like relative supply/demand into that market?

Randall Stuewe: And I think we’ll team this one. I mean, first off, when we wake up in the morning, we’re thinking of what’s the best destination for our feedstock. And during 2024, it was the first time in my career and probably and I don’t know I’d have the history that we saw European fat cat [ph] 3 fat moved to the U.S. That doesn’t happen. What’s that a result of? That’s a result of underperformance of the renewables sector in Europe, whether that’s R&D or whether that’s biodiesel. That is changing right now, although Neste continues to have their operating problems, but it feels like that’s changing now, and those fats are going to stay within the boundaries of the European continent. When you look then at the South America, a lot of South America was headed up here our plants. It’s a great deal because it improves the margins of our rendering business down there. But now with the mandates that are happening down there, it’s slowly being absorbed as a premium to the U.S. And then the U.S., we’re still waiting on the two big guys on the West Coast to consistently and even run waste fats, whether that’s [indiscernible] or whether that’s animal fats and that should change things. I mean clearly, Geismar should have the ability. They’ve been around nearly as long as we have, and so they’ve kind of mastered that. So really, at the end of the day, the feedstock situation should change here if you have the capability. On the outbound product side, as Matt said, it’s a fine the highest price market and sell it. Clearly, Neste is creating a lot of spot opportunities here, whether it’s in the continent or Canada or California for us right now. So that’s given us the courage in the Q4 here. Guys, anything you want to add to that?

Robert Day: I would just say that we’re seeing demand increase all around the world. The natural supplier of that demand is product that’s been imported into the United States. We — what we see in 2025 is a significant increase in demand in the United States for renewable diesel relative — on a relative basis because of what’s happening with overall supply and demand. So if there are global opportunities, as Matt said, Diamond Green Diesel is well positioned to take advantage of those opportunities, but we’re seeing a really attractive market in the United States in the next year.

Operator: Our next question comes from Ben Kallo of Baird. Go ahead, please.

Ben Kallo: Hey good morning guys. Just on next year like possibility of shuttering capacity. Could you just talk about any kind of dynamics you think that people would run even at a loss in the marketplace? And then I have a follow-up question.

Matt Jansen: I mean those dynamics could exist certainly in biodiesel if there — if it’s an extension of a crush an OC [ph] crush business and crush margins are wide, they could theoretically run at a slightly negative margin. But slightly negative. We don’t anticipate to see significant percentages of — capacity running at large negative margins.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. Ben, this is Randy. Ultimately, Chevron (NYSE:) went out and bought those REG assets. They’ve shuttered two of them. With the 45Z coming on, I’m not sure what those economics look like even with LCFS increasing here, it’s still capped at 5% biodiesel. But you got to keep in mind that the RVO grows by 350 million, 400 million gallons next year. Again, that’s a big number in itself. So it’s hard to see much shuttering. Really, if we kind of rewind the movie to into 2023, every bet on the table was, well, — and this is by all the sell-side guys was a P66 and Martinez, we’re going to run wide open and flood the market with RINs and product, not happened. And we’re starting to see that change, while we don’t share our book that we sell other folks, we are only now starting to sell some waste fats out there to other people. On the other side, there’s still one of them out there that’s only buying refined bleach soybean oil and a lot of it is imported. And you’ve got to question the economics on it because it involves paying a 19.1% duty. And so unless you’re going to export that product, you don’t get the duty drawback. So there are some people out here doing some, what I’d say, less than economic things. We hope that rational minds prevail and — but ultimately, I think you’re going to see enough growth in the market and then enough arbitrage from us, meaning getting out of 250 gallons from R&D to SAF and some other things. Vertex (NASDAQ:) has gone now. We’re setting up for a pretty good marketplace, I see next year.

Ben Kallo: Thank you. Just on the SAF front, we saw like loan guarantees, I think, announced at different pathways for SAF. How do you envision the market evolving? Are we going to — do you think we’re going to be in a period of where we get to oversupply? Or what prefer on that. Thank you guys.

Matt Jansen: Yes, hi Ben. Good morning. This is, I would say, on paper, the market for SaaS demand is — could be up to 4 billion gallons, maybe more. So it’s quite a bit larger than any available production that’s online today.

Randall Stuewe: Yes. Ben, this is Randy again. I mean the SAF market is developing and our book is building out there, as we say. And the margins are what we really talked about. What’s interesting in that business is if the supply chain is far more complicated. It’s airport by airport, airplane airline by airline and then in wing supplier by end wing supplier. Those deals are happening right now. Some of them announced, some don’t want them announced. If you look at Europe today, it has a mandate in 2025, the obligated party is the in wing supplier or the oil company but they don’t have to be compliant till the end of 2025. So a little bit of dragging on the feet there, but it’s developing. And ultimately, you’re seeing China now talk about an SAF mandate this thing, I think is — once again, what we believe is we’ve got an early mover advantage here. We want to get a plant one sold out and committed for three years, as Matt said, and then we’re well positioned to move forward with additional production into that space if it so warrants. So — but it’s just going to take a little bit of time here. Like we said, the plant is mechanically completed its commissioning and we’re optimistic we’ll be fully operational and quality in spec here before the end of the year.

Operator: Okay. Our next question is from Jason Gabelman of TD Cohen. Go ahead, please.

Jason Gabelman: Yes, hi good morning and thanks for taking my question. I’ll just ask one since we’re at the top of the hour. It looks like DGD’s distribution outpaced the earnings from the company and the implied cash generation. Can you just talk about that dynamic? And there’s a change of distribution policy there? Thanks.

Brad Phillips: Yes, Jason, this is Brad. If you’ll recall back — it may not, but back earlier in the year, we saw coming out of the holidays of 2023, a slowdown, a backup in D.C. on payouts on back to parties and at least to Diamond Green. And they were really two to three months behind. That once revenues came in, in the middle of May, believe it was into the IRS as we internally anticipated, they started doing a real catch-up. So there was a — really we got to the point during Q3, where we really got more on a normal course by — during the quarter on the BTC receipt. So that had a big impact on — we put this — we received multiple distributions during the third quarter. And we’re still looking here at the end of the year possibilities of additional distributions. We’ll see how it turns out.

Jason Gabelman: That ETC catch-up is now complete, though?

Brad Phillips: Well, it’s ongoing every month. It’s — they’re pretty much caught up. That’s — I’ll leave it at that.

Jason Gabelman: Okay, thanks.

Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Randall Stuewe for any closing remarks.

Randall Stuewe: Once again, thank you for all your questions. As always, if you have additional questions, reach out to Suann. Stay safe. Have a great holiday season, and we look forward to talking to you again in the future.

Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.